Saturday, January 24, 2015

momentary pleasures

momentary pleasures [1]

by p. l. easure
alternative title: demons vs. Angels
momentary pleasures
long and lasting pain
one lasts for a moment; the other (now/again)
one leads to the other, but you’re never sure (which way?)
momentary pleasures are the things we seek (today)

  • every, living thing strives to experience one thing, and one thing only… during every, single moment of its life: the experience of pleasure.

  • at times, the experience of pleasure is experienced as (even the slightest) movement away from pain.

  • there is no doubt that certain (momentary) pleasures can lead to (what feels like) everlasting pain.  ((one example: chocolate orgasm > unwanted weight gain))

  • but isn’t it possible that a pain-full experience could lead to the desire for something more pleasurable?  doesn’t the flu result in the desire to simply be absent of symptoms?

  • is it possible that the pain-pleasure cycle  is akin to the inspiration-expiration cycle – the union of opposites that (obviously) is the basic necessity for life itself?

  • does every, living thing calculate the cost-benefit analysis of the pleasure-pain cycle, and does every, living thing make a calculated choice (in each now moment) that weighs the experience of now pleasure against the potential of (future) pain?

  • if so… isn’t every living thing experiencing its highest possible sense of wellness, in every, single, solitary moment?  isn’t it possible that every, single, living thing is (relatively speaking) Bliss?

  • if the Uni-Verse (One-ness, God, the Absolute, the Is, etc.) is in-deed Love… doesn’t it make sense that Love would experience Her-self by experiencing that which She is not?

  • is your most feared enemy, in Reality, your most wanted Angel?

-the beginning :-)

[1] martino, j. (1.24-1.15).  lost & found © 2015 by

Wednesday, January 7, 2015

In-finite perspective

by web o. f. comments

let me show my bias as i comment on your post
in each thread, we criticize (we praise, we judge, we boast)

such a Grand Design (allowing Spirit-world to play)
relative-i-ty: the very order of the day

hotbed of debate (yet from another view, Connective)
living in a Uni-Verse of Infinite perspective

* it is soooooooooooo much fun (okay, arduous at times) reading ‘comments’ on internet articles and facebook posts.

* in an effort to be ‘right,’ we do little more than scream our biased perspectives out – to (virtually) anyone that will listen.

* is it possible that Spirit (the Is, the All, the Source, Love, etc.) is learning and growing via the infinite perspectives of the physical, relative world?

* it would (additionally) be arrogant to believe that we (the relative world) are the only mechanism for Uni-Verse-All feedback.  after all, we are very, very primitive in matters of the brain, DNA, dark matter, etc.

* everyone (humans, animals, plants, viruses, cells, molecules, atoms, etc.) has perspective.

* is it possible that the void of Source asked Herself a question, such as “who Am I?

* is it possible that wIe (in every potential UniVerseAll expression) are the answer to that question?  if so, every single perception would be cutting-edge Godliness, contributing to the UniVerseAll Consciousness of the One.

[i] martino, j. (1.7-14.15).  book 75: lost & found © 2015 by