fifty shades of grey [i]
by dom i. nant and su b. missive
when dominant: submissive
when reason doesn’t rhyme
when love aligns with pain (the Same)
when places change (with time)
when sub and dom exchange a bond of trust along the way…
when upside-down and inside-out:
when fifty shades of grey
* what if that which appears to be dominant is, in actual-ity… submissive?
* in “fifty shades of grey”, who is straight-forward? who is manipulating whom? who really has the power? who is really in control? who submits, again and again and again?
* interpersonal relationships are never 'black and white'. fifty shades of grey might actually refer to the norm (albeit, a moving target), while seducing our attention toward the apparently abnormal.
* what if the Uni-Verse decided to man-i-fest as multiple variants (of color, scent, and sound)? what if we choose to look around?
* what if the Uni-Verse was a dancing play of love-ego-love-ego-love? what if below is above?
* what if that which appeared to be love-ing was egoic (e.g. the self-absorbed ‘healer’) and that which appeared to be self-ish (e.g. the hummingbird) was looking for Union?
* what if our whole way of thinking is inside-out and upside-down, any-way?
what if pain is play?
what if the Uni-verse-All manifestation
dominant and submissive?
* what if Every-thing is fifty shades of grey?
he appears skittish, he acts skittish, heck... he is skittish!
...but what he really, Really, REALLY wants...
is the experience of Unified, Passionate, Love-ing Bliss.